Pip: Philosophyofgoodnews has a habit of finding a four-minute Egyptian film and using it to dismantle the entire architecture of modern arrogance — and honestly, fair enough.

Mara: Today we’re spending our time with one post that moves through film, philosophy, Rumi, and Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks to make a case for why simple human goodness is still the most powerful force available to us.

Pip: Let’s start with that argument — and what it asks of the people who hold power over others.

We have a future, and it will be great!

Pip: The post opens in a familiar tension: people in positions that affect entire nations, operating not from principle but from personal preservation — and what that costs the rest of us.

Mara: The setup is a friend sharing a short film, and out of that comes this: “It shows that being human is not a state of your wallet but of your soul.”

Pip: That line does a lot of work. It separates the question of power from the question of character — having resources or a title doesn’t make you human in the meaningful sense.

Mara: Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks is quoted at length on the difference between pride and arrogance. The key line is “Arrogance diminishes others and therefore diminishes us” — and the post uses that to distinguish leaders who elevate from those who simply dominate.

Pip: There’s a real structural argument underneath the warmth here — that arrogance isn’t just a personality flaw, it’s a mechanism of harm at scale.

Mara: Rumi gets two appearances. The first frames appetite and ego as “bandits on the road” that steal from your deeper intelligence. The second is more grounded: a man who goes to his attic daily to look at his worn-out coat and old shoes, remembering where he came from, so he doesn’t “get drunk on ego and arrogance.”

Pip: Humility as a daily practice, not a disposition you’re born with.

Mara: The post closes with a direct statement about accountability: whoever is blackmailed into a position has no right to sacrifice other human lives simply to hold onto that position. That’s framed as basic common sense, not moral heroism.

Pip: And the final instruction is almost architectural in its simplicity — “If we cannot unite, let’s at least not divide.”

Mara: The film, the quotes, the argument — they all converge on one claim: goodness doesn’t require resources or status. It requires choosing not to transfer your pain onto others.

---

Pip: A four-minute film, two philosophers, and one very clear line about souls versus wallets — that’s a tight brief for how to run a civilization.

Mara: The question it leaves open is whether the people who most need that message are the ones most insulated from ever hearing it.

Continue reading here WE HAVE A FUTURE AND IT WILL BE GREAT!

Prepared by Darko Richard Lancelot

June 22, 2026

Philosophyofgoodnews

Connect and Respect