What History Left to know about the Future to Come

We, the constant curious, would like very much to learn what the future brings. However, a question arises.

How to know what future brings if we are not aware about the past, the thoughts, the practice, the plans and methodology applied for any future to happen?

The journey towards the truth even if it looks long, is the shortest. It takes a long time to find it, but with less travel. Curiosity, patience, talent for making mosaics, consistency and above all an open and clear mind are indeed important ingredients for uncovering the real truth.

“The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a posetive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapsenin a passive posture. We believe a new world order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species” (From 1975 book “On creation of a just World Order). Let’s ask one rhetorical question-

What if the collapse was and is the plan?

Mikhail Gorbachev the husband of Raisa Maximovna Titarenko Gorbacheva, did not have a collapse in mind when stating in his UN speech of 1988:”Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.” Then Yeltsin, Clinton etc.., and “sustainability” came…

‐——————————————————————–

Let’s start our journey that will be published in sequels, with Otto Von Bismarck acknowledgement which by itself revealed one of the ways of how the “business” that influence events and our future that makes history, could have been done. These events, as most occurred by whispering in bed , are not presented in our history books, but still, it can be found elsewhere, if you are curious enough to poke your nose into everything interesting and feel the real smell of history. One of that initiations, neither masonic nor illuminati, but highly human, have happened to me while I was reading the following quote of Otto Von Bismarck:

“Not my talents and capacities made me great. But the fact that my mother was the mistress of Soult, one of “300”, who all helped me.”

After reading above Bismarck not widely repeated citation, curiosity asks the question: Who was that mysterious Mr. Soult?

While researching Mr. Soult name, he proudly appeared, and shyly but firmly disclosed himself. So now we had three people that could have crucial influence in positioning Otto Von Bismarck in different places and slowly preparing him for some postion that would serve their deepest interest and looked like some extraordinary events. We have Otto Von Bismarck father, Mother, and Mr. Nicolas-Jean de Dieu Soult.

Otto’s father up left, mother right and Jean de Dieu Soult down left.

Mr. Soult, Duke of Dalmatia, the title given to him by Napoleon I , was born as Nicolas-Jean de Dieu Soult (1769-1851)on March 29, 1769 in Saint-Amans-la-Bastide, a village now part of the Tarn department in the south of France. The son of a solicitor, he joined the army in 1785 and was a corporal at the time of the French Revolution of 1789. In 1804 he was promoted to Marshal and in 1805, he was made Colonel General of the Imperial Guard and Commander in Chief of the Boulogne camp. As per “Napoleon and Empire,” in Austerlitz, he led the decisive attack against the massed Allies of Austro-Hungarian and Russian Empire forces, earning himself the “sobriquet”(nickname) given by Napoleon I, the “best tactician in Europe.”
He also played an important role in the victories at Jena and Preussisch-Eylau and was rewarded by Napoleon, who named him military governor in Berlin, and made him Duc de Dalmatie (Duke of Dalmatia).

He was Minister of War and three times Prime Minister of France. Very influential person and Grand Officer of the Grand Orient Masonic Lodge and a member of “L’Harmonie Universale” Chapter. Above information confirmed the influence this man had and as his Berlin assignment stuck my eyes I felt goosebumps. So, he was in Berlin.

He was 20 years older then Wilhelmine Luise Mencken the mother of Otto Von Bismarck who was born in the year when French Revolution occurred, 1789. Further, Wilhelmine Luise Mencken had an experience of relationship with older man like her husband and Otto’s father Karl Wilhelm Ferdinand von Bismarck, who was born in 1771. As, how it is somehow slipping from history, Ferdinand, the youngest of four brothers was the least educated and as per Ernst Engelberg( the writer of Otto Von Bismarck Biography)”richly indolent,” while Luise was the born Berliner, and as described by Otto himself “a beautiful woman,” who’s father Anastasious Ludwig Mencken was Royal Cabinet Councillor and in 1797 a Cabinet Chief of the Frederick William III. Mr. Anastasious Ludwig Mencken died suddenly in 1801. He was 49 years old and his only daughter had only 12 years. That puts the light of the way how Jean de Dieu Soult and Wilhelmine Luise Mencken could have meet, had an affair and exchange their intimate thoughts in bed. No coincidence.

To confirm the power and influence his mother had to pull the right strings, that are still historicaly “extraordinary silent,” let me quote following words from the book I got in Berlin in 2018 written by Jonathan Steinberg, Bismarck-A Life:

“In July of 1838 he (Otto Von Bismarck) visited his mother in Berlin who was now terminally ill and poured out his heart. He told her how miserable he was, and begged her to help him find some better position, how his life had become unbearable, the work disquieted him, and how the prospect of spending his whole life to end up a “Regierungsprasident” (government president) on 2000 thaler a year filled his great soul with despair. Wilhelmine in turn wrote to Ferdinand who then decided to make over three Pomeraninan estates to the two sons and to withdraw to Schonhausen.”

Even terminally ill, she was still able to write letters and we do not know yet if some of the letters she wrote before her death on 1st of January 1839 have been addressed to Nicholas- Jean de Dieu Soult. What is certain is that she imagined life she could not have but still tried to use all her influence to help her sons. She confessed in 1830 letter to Otto’s brother Bernhard:

“I imagined that my greatest good fortune would be to have grown son, who, educated under my very eyes, would agree with me, but as a man would be called to penetrate deeper into the world of the intellect than I as a woman could do. I rejoiced in the thought of the intellectual exchange, the mutual encouragement for mental and spiritual engagement, and of that satisfying feeling to have such pleasures with a person who would be through the bonds of nature nearest to my heart, and who, still more, through kinship of the spirit, would draw ever closer to me. The time for these hopes to be fulfilled has arrived but they have disappeared and unfortunately, I must confess, for ever.”

As they say

The rest is history.

When you have to do with invisible hand nothing naïve is being done in bed, even with pleasures involved as all is the part of some plan. Like the coincidences!

In particular case and in all the other cases same methods are used. Thoughts were digested, preparation has been going on, recruitment was working 24/7 and even the people were informed. But in vain, as usual. One way used to inform people in those days was by novels, as it was Benjamin Disraeli 1844 novel CONINGSBY.

The character in the novel known as “Sidonia”( based on Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild born on 22 November 1808 with whom Disraeli became good friend) says in the book: ” That mighty revolution which is at this moment preparing in Germany and which will be a greater and a second Reformation , and of which so little is known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of the Jews, who almost monopolize the professional chair of Germany…. the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”

But my humble suggestion is not to stuck on Jews only as you will miss the point.

To continue reading please follow instructions below. You will not regret it.

However, many surprises are awaiting you in the continuation of this and publishing of the following texts, which will contribute to understanding real history that will help you prepare for REAL FUTURE! These texts will be available only to those who subscribe for a year following the link below.

There are options for USD 11.00/ EURO 10.00/ GBP 8.80, so it is up to you to pick your choice. After receiving your subscription payment you will get by email the continuation of this and all the other posts we will publish in the duration of one year from the date of your subscription, including any new pamphlets and eBooks.

https://buy.stripe.com/14k7sH123aogcmY00f

When paying please send a mail to philosophyofgoodnews@gmail.com to enable us to send you the continuation of this as well as other articles we will publish in the future. Thank you!

September 7, 2023

By philosophyofgoodnews.com

Connect and Respect

Discover more from Philosophyofgoodnews

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started